"Full-Time" Work Misconception Limits Life Planning and Activity Engagement
TL;DR
- The misconception that "full-time" work consumes one's entire time leads to underestimating available personal hours, hindering proactive life planning and activity engagement.
- Recognizing that 35-40 hours of work leaves approximately 72 waking hours weekly enables individuals to realistically schedule significant personal pursuits like exercise or volunteering.
- Reinterpreting "full-time" work as having ample space for other life aspects shifts the mindset from "no time" to actively identifying and allocating time for desired activities.
- The phrase "full-time" inaccurately implies total time commitment, potentially causing individuals to make suboptimal choices regarding work-life balance or personal development.
- Tracking personal time reveals substantial non-work hours even with full-time employment, demonstrating the feasibility of integrating hobbies, social activities, and personal well-being.
Deep Dive
The core argument is that the common perception of "full-time" work as consuming the entirety of one's time is a misnomer, as a standard 35-40 hour work week leaves a significant surplus of hours for other life pursuits. This redefinition of "full-time" has profound implications for individuals' capacity to engage in activities beyond work, challenging the notion that long hours necessitate sacrificing personal life.
The prevalent understanding of "full-time" employment as demanding one's complete temporal availability is fundamentally inaccurate. A typical full-time schedule of 35-40 hours per week, when contrasted with a 168-hour week and accounting for approximately 56 hours of sleep, leaves roughly 72 waking hours available for non-work activities. This surplus is often underestimated, leading to a widespread belief that individuals have insufficient time for personal pursuits, family, exercise, or volunteering. The consequence of this misinterpretation is a self-imposed limitation, where individuals, even those working full-time, may feel they lack the capacity for anything beyond their professional obligations.
This misconception can create unnecessary trade-offs. For instance, individuals with families might opt for part-time work, believing that full-time employment inherently encroaches too much on family time. However, if full-time work is not truly "full," the balance may already lean more toward life outside of work than perceived, making the decision for part-time work less about necessity and more about an adherence to a flawed premise. Furthermore, individuals who do work full-time may overlook the substantial pockets of time available for personal engagement--even a few hours scattered throughout the week for exercise or hobbies, in addition to ample time for socializing and family.
The practical implication of recognizing this temporal surplus is an empowerment to reclaim and allocate time intentionally. By tracking time, individuals can objectively see the hours available outside of work, including evenings and weekends, which collectively amount to a significant portion of a standard work week. This awareness shifts the mindset from one of scarcity ("I have no time") to one of possibility ("I have time, and what do I want to do with it?"). This enables individuals to integrate activities like exercise, reading, or hobbies into their schedules, fostering a more fulfilling life without necessarily reducing working hours. The key takeaway is that "full-time" work is a misnomer, and understanding the actual hours involved unlocks the potential for a balanced life, allowing individuals to pursue diverse interests alongside their professional commitments.
Action Items
- Track personal time allocation: For 1 week, log hours spent on work, sleep, and personal activities to identify available time outside of job duties.
- Reframe "full-time" perception: Acknowledge that 35-40 hours of work per week leaves approximately 72 waking hours for other life activities.
- Schedule 3-4 hours weekly for exercise or volunteering, and 2-3 hours for hobbies, within identified non-work time.
- Plan 1-2 specific activities per week (e.g., 30-minute morning run, 45-minute evening reading) to utilize available personal time.
Key Quotes
"Full-time implies the full amount of your time. But in many cases, a full-time job amounts to approximately 35 to 40 hours a week."
Laura argues that the common understanding of "full-time" is a misnomer. She points out that a typical full-time job occupies only 35 to 40 hours of a 168-hour week, leaving a significant amount of time for other activities. This observation challenges the notion that full-time work consumes the entirety of one's time.
"I remember when I first did the math and realized that a week has 168 hours. If you sleep 8 hours a night, so that is 56 hours per week, and subtract 56 and 40 from 168, you get 72 hours left over."
Laura illustrates the discrepancy between the perception and reality of work hours. By calculating the total hours in a week and subtracting typical sleep and work durations, she demonstrates that a substantial number of hours remain available for non-work activities. This highlights the ample free time available even for those working full-time.
"Unfortunately, using the word full to describe 35 to 40 hours per week of work causes all sorts of issues. For instance, some folks assume that they should work part-time because they have a family. And because they don't want work to get the full amount of their time."
Laura explains the negative consequences of the "full-time" misinterpretation. She notes that this phrasing leads some individuals to believe they must work part-time to accommodate family needs, when in reality, a standard full-time job already leaves considerable time for personal life. This suggests that the label itself creates unnecessary limitations.
"The other problem with the word full is that folks who do work full-time often assume they have no time for other things. I mean, how could they? Work is consuming the full amount of their time. Except that it isn't."
Laura identifies another issue stemming from the misnomer "full-time." She observes that individuals working 35-40 hours often believe they have no time for other pursuits because they perceive their work as consuming their entire schedule. Laura counters this by reiterating that this perception is inaccurate, as significant time remains outside of work hours.
"Once you recognize that full-time work still leaves a lot of time for other things, this opens up possibilities. Instead of assuming you have no time, you can start to assume that you do have time. And you can start asking what you'd like to do with it."
Laura proposes a shift in mindset based on the accurate understanding of work hours. She suggests that acknowledging the available time outside of a full-time job can empower individuals to proactively plan and engage in other activities. This perspective encourages a more intentional use of non-work hours.
"Full-time isn't full-time at all. It is some amount of time, but generally, there is space for everything else."
Laura concludes by directly challenging the literal meaning of "full-time." She asserts that the term is misleading, as a standard full-time job does not occupy all available time. Laura emphasizes that there is typically sufficient time within a week to accommodate various aspects of life beyond work.
Resources
External Resources
Tools & Software
- Monarch - All-in-one personal finance tool for budgeting, accounts, investments, and net worth tracking.
Websites & Online Resources
- Aqua True.com - Website for a countertop water purifier.
- CVS.com - Website for CVS pharmacy and community services.
Podcasts & Audio
- Before Breakfast - Podcast production by iHeartRadio.
- iHeartRadio - Podcast network.
Other Resources
- Guaranteed Human - Identifier for non-iHeart podcasts.