Brain Constructs Reality Through Active Sensory Editing
TL;DR
- Tinnitus, a persistent ringing in the ears, arises from the brain creating sound to compensate for damaged auditory fibers, demonstrating how sensory perception is an active construction rather than a passive reception of reality.
- Hidden hearing loss, where damage to loud-sound fibers goes undetected by standard tests, can lead to conditions like tinnitus and difficulty understanding speech in noisy environments, highlighting limitations in current audiological evaluations.
- The brain's "editing" of sensory input, exemplified by audio illusions like the octave illusion, is a survival mechanism that allows for rapid decision-making by simplifying complex data, even if it means sacrificing absolute accuracy.
- Visual perception, as seen with the dress color debate, is subjective and influenced by individual assumptions about lighting conditions, underscoring that our interpretation of visual information is an active, inferential process.
- Learning a new language involves the brain constructing word boundaries that are not objectively present in the audio stream, demonstrating how cognitive frameworks shape the perception of even fundamental sensory data.
- The brain's tendency to "jump to conclusions" for survival means that the cost of perceptual error is often less severe than inaction, prioritizing quick responses over complete information processing.
- Mindfulness and acceptance, rather than masking, are presented as the most effective current treatments for tinnitus, suggesting that managing perception by integrating sensory experiences is key to well-being.
Deep Dive
Our brains construct reality by actively editing sensory input, a process that, while essential for survival, means our perception is not a direct reflection of the external world. This inherent filtering mechanism is responsible for phenomena like tinnitus, audio illusions, and even how we perceive colors, demonstrating that our senses are more interpretative than purely receptive, and this subjective experience is a product of our brain's survival-driven need to make rapid calls.
The core argument is that our brains are not passive receivers of information but active processors that shape our experience of reality. This is illustrated most vividly through the phenomenon of tinnitus, where a persistent ringing in the ears arises not from external sound but from the brain's internal compensation for damaged auditory fibers. Researchers explain this as a "climate control system" for sound: when sensory input is reduced, the brain generates its own signal to maintain a perceived baseline, akin to phantom limb syndrome for sound. This active construction of reality extends beyond hearing. In visual perception, the "dress" illusion, where people saw the same image as either black and blue or white and gold, highlights how assumptions about lighting, influenced by factors like being a night owl versus a morning person, lead to different interpretations. Similarly, the perception of distinct words in a foreign language, or even the breaks between words in one's own language, are not inherent in the audio stream but are imposed by the brain's interpretive framework.
The second-order implication of this brain-as-editor model is profound: our perception is inherently subjective and, at times, unreliable. The reason for this is evolutionary; survival depends on rapid decision-making. If our ancestors hesitated to act on ambiguous sensory cues, they would be at a disadvantage against predators or competitors. Therefore, the brain prioritizes making a call, even a potentially wrong one, over inaction. The cost of being wrong in perception--experiencing mild distress or an illusion--is far less severe than the cost of being wrong in a survival situation, which could lead to death and the end of a lineage. This leads to a critical takeaway: we should maintain a degree of humility about our certainty in our perceptions. While our senses are generally reliable due to redundant systems (like the interplay of auditory and visual information), they are not infallible windows to objective truth. Understanding that our brains are actively constructing our reality, rather than passively observing it, encourages a more nuanced approach to what we believe to be true, acknowledging that there may be deeper layers of reality our current sensory apparatus cannot access.
Action Items
- Audit sensory perception: For 3-5 common illusions (e.g., octave illusion, dress color), document the underlying sensory input and the brain's interpretation to identify potential misinterpretations.
- Design "truth-seeking" communication protocols: Establish 2-3 methods for verifying information across different sensory inputs (e.g., cross-referencing auditory and visual cues) to mitigate subjective filtering.
- Implement a "pre-mortem" analysis for critical decisions: Before acting on a significant decision, conduct a 15-minute session to identify potential sensory misinterpretations or brain-constructed realities that could lead to failure.
- Track 5-10 instances of "jump to conclusions" behavior: For personal or team decisions, note situations where immediate action was taken based on incomplete sensory data to assess the cost of being wrong versus the cost of inaction.
Key Quotes
"If you don't know what tinnitus is it's like that ringing you hear in your ears after getting out of a loud concert but it's all the time the din of the tinnitus is just constantly going on it's like man's search for meaning basically but in your brain"
The host, Jonquilyn Hill, introduces tinnitus by comparing it to the temporary ringing after a loud event but emphasizes its persistent nature. Hill frames this constant sound as analogous to humanity's "search for meaning," suggesting it represents a fundamental, albeit internal, struggle within the brain.
"basically in your ear there's fibers that respond to soft sounds and there's fibers that respond to loud sounds so that means there's fibers that respond to whispers or kind of the asmr stuff and then there's fibers that really get activated if you're crossing the street or you're in an airplane or a vacuum cleaner or something and on a hearing test what they do is they put you in this you know soundproof room the audiologist sits next to you says raise your hand whenever you can hear a beep and the beep gets softer and softer and softer until you can't hear the beep and what they're doing is just testing the soft fibers they're just testing if you can hear the quietest possible noise and if you can hear the quietest possible noise they say hey your hearing is fine but that doesn't test damage that could happen to the loud fibers"
Scientist Stefan Maison explains the concept of "hidden hearing loss," detailing how standard hearing tests only assess the fibers sensitive to soft sounds. Maison points out that damage to fibers that respond to loud sounds, which can lead to conditions like tinnitus, goes undetected by these tests.
"now what happens in your brain is your brain is kind of doing a similar thing for sound but when some of the nerve fibers are damaged you're getting less input than the brain would expect and so it's kind of like turning on the heat so to speak but it can't get the sound that it needs so it kind of creates its own sound to fill in that gap oh these neurons like sensitize themselves they're like oh i need to make my activity level go back to where it's supposed to be i'm going to swap out different parts and make myself more sensitive to excitatory inputs so now you start to perceive a sound that is not there"
Researcher Dan Polly likens the brain's response to damaged auditory nerve fibers to a climate control system. Polly explains that when the brain receives less auditory input than expected, it compensates by generating its own sound to fill the perceived gap, a process where neurons become more sensitive to create this internal signal.
"so our brain has a superpower how do we use it for good that's up next support for the show comes from givewell givewell is an independent resource that offers transparent research about great giving opportunities they spent 18 years researching global health and poverty alleviation and they say they only direct funding to the highest impact opportunities they've found here are some examples of what donations to givewell's recommended charities can achieve bed nets and preventative medication to reduce outbreaks of malaria distributing vitamin a supplements to reduce deficiencies and save lives and cash incentives for routine childhood vaccines over 150 000 donors have already trusted givewell to direct more than two and a half billion dollars and according to givewell rigorous evidence suggests that these donations will save over 300 000 lives and improve the lives of millions more you can find all their research and recommendations on their site for free to make a tax deductible donation today go to givewell org and pick podcast and enter explain it to me at checkout make sure they know that you heard about givewell from explain it to me again that's givewell org to donate or to find out more"
The host, Jonquilyn Hill, transitions from discussing the brain's "superpower" of perception to a sponsorship message. Hill introduces GiveWell as an organization providing research on high-impact charitable giving opportunities, highlighting their work in global health and poverty alleviation.
"so the question is does your brain basically create a matrix for you what is real how do you define real so you're not seeing reality unfiltered you're just living in the matrix like literally if you're talking about what you can feel what you can smell what you can taste and see then real is simply electrical signals interpreted by your brain so it's this idea that our senses are subjective correct because everything that you perceive is filtered through your sensory organs and then goes through your brain and if we assume that you have a unique brain which i do then you're bringing a lot of yourself to what you experience"
Professor Pascal Wallach discusses the brain's role in constructing our perception of reality, likening it to a "matrix." Wallach explains that what we perceive as real is ultimately electrical signals interpreted by our individual brains, making our sensory experiences subjective.
"what we could show is that it has to do with your assumptions about lighting if you assume the thing was backlit or in a shadow or illuminated by white light bright light let's say sunlight it would be white and gold and if you assume it was artificial light or inside then you would see it as black and blue and that has to do with what you have seen more of so if you're like a night owl you've seen more artificial light by the way just to be clear it's not gonna be true for everybody because this lifestyle is only a proxy for light exposure but something we can measure"
The speaker explains the phenomenon behind the "The Dress" illusion, where perception of color depends on assumptions about lighting. The speaker states that if one assumes the dress was lit by sunlight, they see it as white and gold, whereas assuming artificial light leads to seeing it as black and blue, linking this to an individual's past light exposure.
Resources
External Resources
Books
- "The Matrix" - Mentioned as a potential analogy for how the brain constructs reality.
Articles & Papers
- "The Sound Barrier" (Unexplainable podcast series) - Referenced as a related series exploring sound.
People
- Astrid Stawiarz - Photographer for Getty Images for the Hearing Health Foundation.
- Avishay Artsy - Producer of the episode.
- Dan Polly - Researcher at Mass Eye and Ear.
- David Tatasciore - Engineer for the episode.
- Diana Deutsch - Psychology professor at UC San Diego, studies audio illusions.
- Jace Glickman Hill - Host of the episode.
- Jenny Lawton - Editor of the episode.
- Jonquilyn Hill - Host of the episode.
- Kelly - Listener who wrote into Unexplainable about tinnitus.
- Melissa Hirsch - Fact-checker for the episode.
- Mike Corriss - Science writer who lost his hearing and got a cochlear implant.
- Noam Hassenfeld - Host of Unexplainable, colleague of the episode's host.
- Pascal Wallach - Professor of data science, neuroscience, and psychology at New York University.
- Stefan Maison - Director of the tinnitus clinic at Mass Eye and Ear hospital in Boston.
Organizations & Institutions
- Amazon Ads - Mentioned for its omnichannel metrics.
- Apple Card - Mentioned for its tap-to-pay feature with Apple Pay.
- Apple Pay - Mentioned as a payment method used with Apple Card.
- Getty Images - Source of a photo used for the episode.
- Givewell - Independent resource for researching giving opportunities.
- Goldman Sachs Bank USA - Issuer of Apple Card.
- Hearing Health Foundation - Organization for which a photo was taken.
- Jack Daniel Distillery - Producer of Jack Daniel's Tennessee Whiskey.
- Mass Eye and Ear hospital - Institution where Stefan Maison and Dan Polly conduct research.
- New York University - Institution where Pascal Wallach is a professor.
- Pro Football Focus (PFF) - Mentioned in the context of a previous episode's guest.
- Strawberry Me - Career coaching service.
- Unexplainable - Vox podcast series.
- Vox - Media company producing the podcast.
Podcasts & Audio
- Explain It to Me - The podcast series hosting the episode.
- Today, Explained - The specific podcast episode.
- Unexplainable - A podcast series mentioned as a collaborator.
Other Resources
- AG1 - Daily health drink.
- AG1 Flavor Sampler - Included in a welcome kit for AG1.
- AG1 NextGen - A specific version of the AG1 health drink.
- AGZ - A new sleep supplement from AG1.
- Apple Card Welcome Kit - Included free gifts for new subscribers.
- Daily Cash Back - Earned when using Apple Card with Apple Pay.
- Hidden Hearing Loss - A concept discussed in relation to tinnitus.
- Jack Daniel's Old No. 7 - A registered trademark for Tennessee Whiskey.
- Malaria Prevention - Mentioned as an impact of donations to Givewell-recommended charities.
- Neurotrophin - A protein discussed in relation to repairing damaged fibers.
- Octave Illusion - An audio illusion studied by Diana Deutsch.
- Vitamin A Supplements - Mentioned as an impact of donations to Givewell-recommended charities.
- White Noise - A type of masking sound for tinnitus.
- Yanny/Laurel Illusion - An audio illusion discussed.