The sports industry is facing a reckoning, and it's not coming from inside the building. Non-endemic brands like Sephora and Dude Perfect are publicly calling out sports organizations for lacking creativity in partnerships and social media. The hidden consequence: sports properties that cling to traditional engagement models risk becoming irrelevant to the brands and younger consumers who will define the next decade. This conversation reveals that the real competitive advantage lies not in chasing the next tech trend, but in building the organizational muscle to meet audiences and partners on their own terms. That shift requires discomfort now but pays off in lasting relevance. Read this if you need to understand where the sports business is actually heading, not where it's been.
Why the Obvious Fix (More Content) Won't Save You
Day one of the Brand Innovation Summit delivered a recurring theme that should unsettle anyone running a sports property: the people you want to partner with think you're not trying hard enough. Andrew Yaffy, CEO of Dude Perfect, didn't mince words when he said from the stage that "sports teams suck at social media." The immediate reaction might be defensiveness, but the downstream effect is more dangerous. If the largest creator-driven media companies see sports as creatively stagnant, they'll invest their time and audience elsewhere. The system responds by routing around sports altogether. YouTube creators, esports, and short-form content already compete for the same attention. The consequence for sports organizations that don't evolve: a slow bleed of cultural relevance that compounds over years.
The same pattern emerged from the brand side. Michelle New from Sephora noted that the partnership teams she dealt with "had not really been creative enough in how they were kind of approaching a brand that... had not been in sports historically." Sephora only built a dedicated sports partnership team two years ago. The hidden cost here is that sports properties treat non-endemic brands as secondary opportunities, offering standard inventory packages. But brands like Sephora don't want a logo on a digital board. They want integration into the fan experience that aligns with their own customer base. The sports organizations that figure this out now will capture a new revenue stream. Those that don't will watch those dollars flow to entertainment properties that are more flexible.
"Sports teams suck at social media."
-- Andrew Yaffy, CEO of Dude Perfect
The Tech Partnership That Compounded Over a Decade
Irving Mejia-Hilario highlighted the AWS-NFL partnership as a case study in how sponsorships evolve when you think in systems. What started in the late 2010s as an RFID-related sponsorship turned into the expansive relationship where "the AWS Thumb grant is on everything." The immediate benefit was clear: the NFL got tracking data. But the second-order effect is that AWS became embedded in the league's infrastructure, handling AI and forward-looking technology that teams and the league lack the capacity to build themselves. The implication is that tech partnerships are no longer just revenue line items. They are operational dependencies. The teams that treat them as such will have better fan experiences and data capabilities. The teams that treat them as sponsorships will fall behind and not even notice until the gap is unbridgeable.
Mejia-Hilario captured the tension well: "everyone gets a little nauseated when we talk AI. It's the big topic all the time. And I think teams and brands and everybody are still trying to figure out what that future looks like. And these tech partners are kind of handling that for them." The hidden advantage for sports organizations: by aligning with tech partners, they outsource the painful R&D phase and focus on application. But that only works if they invest enough trust and integration to make the partnership a two-way street. Over the next three years, the gap between properties that build deep tech partnerships and those that don't will widen dramatically.
The Generational Fork That No One Wants to Face
The conversation about how younger fans consume sports was threaded through multiple panels, and the picture is uncomfortable for traditionalists. Irving noted that kids are "sitting down consuming maybe even highlights, maybe a couple of games, like... a couple of videos on YouTube. It's just a different way of consuming sports." The default assumption in most front offices is that full-game broadcasts will remain the core product indefinitely. That assumption, when extended forward, creates a blind spot. Younger fans aren't less interested in sports. They're interested in a different product format. The sports organizations that adapt to that shift (creating highlight-first digital content, partnering with creators, gamifying the viewing experience) will capture a generation. Those that don't will see their fan base age out without replacement.
Jenn Azara added the multi-generational challenge: "you're serving such a multi generational fan base at this point in time. And so how do you both, you know, meet the parents who are, who are bringing, bringing those kids in there. But, but that new generation, they've got some serious buying power."
"The amount that's changed in 12 months is staggering."
-- Jenn Azara, on women's sports momentum
Women's Sports: The 12-Month Proof Point
Azara previewed a panel on women's sports and noted that the landscape had transformed dramatically in a single year: new leagues, expansion teams, a first billion-dollar valuation, a new WNBA CBA, and a "more refined and sophisticated approach... less of a one size fits all." The immediate take is that momentum is real. But the systems insight is about how that momentum compounds. The fact that media deals now vary by league stage (emerging vs. established) means that the one-size-fits-all sponsorship model is dead. Brands, teams, and leagues that invest in understanding the unique fan bases and media dynamics of each women's sport will capture disproportionate value. Those that treat women's sports as a single category will be left with generic deals that underserve both the properties and the fans.
Key Action Items
- Immediately audit your social media strategy against creator-media expectations. Stop posting only highlights. Dude Perfect's critique implies sports teams are behind on formats, audience engagement, and narrative creation. Over the next quarter, allocate budget to test short-form, personality-driven content.
- Expand your partnership team's definition of "creative" when pitching non-endemic brands. Sephora's feedback suggests that standard sponsorship packages don't work for brands entering sports for the first time. In the next 90 days, conduct a workshop with your sales team to reimagine proposals for out-of-category partners.
- Deepen tech partnerships beyond sponsorship to infrastructure integration. The AWS-NFL path shows that long-term value comes from embedding the partner in your operations, especially for AI and data. This pays off in 12 to 18 months as fan experience and operational efficiency improve.
- Build a dedicated content pipeline for younger fans that doesn't rely on full-game broadcasts. Create highlight-first, creator-friendly assets designed for YouTube and social platforms. This is a longer-term investment that pays off over 2 to 3 years as that cohort moves into their prime spending years.
- Segment your women's sports strategy by league maturity. Don't use the same pitch for the WNBA (established) and a newer league. Tailored media approaches and partnership structures will capture higher value. This requires an investment in data and research over the next six months.
- Assign a senior leader to monitor and adapt to generational consumption shifts. The fork between traditional and new formats will widen. Over the next quarter, set up a small team responsible for tracking how your fan base changes by age cohort and adjusting content strategy accordingly. Discomfort now (cannibalizing some traditional media) creates advantage later.
- Prioritize integration over inventory when selling sponsorships to tech and non-endemic brands. The hidden cost of treating partners as advertisers is losing the operational depth that creates long-term stickiness. Over the next 12 months, redesign sponsorship proposals to include co-creation of fan experiences, data sharing, and joint innovation.