Metadata Platforms Evolve as Foundational Context Layers for AI Agents
TL;DR
- Metadata platforms are evolving from human-centric catalogs to foundational context layers for AI agents, enabling precise outcomes by providing semantics beyond mere context.
- AI agents can now automate complex data management tasks like documentation and classification, supercharging previous automation frameworks and reducing manual effort.
- The integration of AI agents into metadata platforms streamlines workflows by enabling natural language interaction for tasks previously requiring manual UI navigation and tool manipulation.
- Semantics, not just context, is critical for AI outcomes, requiring ontological underpinnings to provide machine-understandable meaning and prevent hallucinations or incorrect inferences.
- Metadata platforms are becoming essential for AI governance, tracking data exposure, agent capabilities, and model quality to ensure responsible and secure AI development.
- The consolidation of data discovery, observability, and governance into unified metadata platforms is a natural evolution driven by user workflows and the increasing complexity of data ecosystems.
- AI agents can bridge the gap between policy experts and data practitioners by translating governance policies into actionable workflows, scaling expertise and reducing bottlenecks.
Deep Dive
The evolution of metadata platforms from human-centric catalogs to foundational context layers for AI is driven by the critical need for precise meaning, not just data discovery. As AI agents become increasingly sophisticated consumers and contributors within data ecosystems, metadata systems must transition from providing mere context to enabling true semantics, thereby mitigating AI hallucinations and ensuring accurate business outcomes. This shift necessitates a unified approach that integrates discovery, observability, and governance, enabling AI to automate complex data management tasks and elevate human effort towards strategic, business-outcome-focused initiatives.
The core argument is that metadata platforms are no longer just for human data practitioners; they are the essential infrastructure for empowering AI. Initially designed to help humans discover and understand data scattered across complex systems, the structural elements of these platforms--like schema-first design, API-first architecture, and unified workflows--have proven to be foundational for AI. The introduction of Large Language Models (LLMs) and agentic use cases has supercharged the potential for automation, allowing AI to take on tasks such as documentation, classification, and policy enforcement. This transition highlights a critical shift: as human-led data preparation proved challenging and error-prone, using AI to prepare data for AI is becoming the only scalable solution.
The implications of this paradigm shift are profound. Firstly, the demand for context engineering--providing AI with the right information--is being met by metadata platforms that offer not just context, but precise semantics. This means moving beyond simple data descriptions to machine-understandable meaning, often through ontological underpinnings, to prevent AI hallucinations and ensure accurate outcomes. For instance, distinguishing an "apple" as a company versus a fruit is crucial for AI reasoning, a distinction that requires semantic understanding beyond basic context.
Secondly, agentic systems strain existing governance frameworks due to their high interaction rates and autonomous actions. Metadata platforms are evolving to manage this by integrating AI governance, tracking AI agents, models, and prompt versions. They are also becoming the natural place to connect AI agents to data, ensuring that access controls, security policies, and usage intent are understood and enforced. This is critical for enterprise-wide AI agents, which must differentiate access and responses based on user identity, role, and the specific use case, preventing data leaks and ensuring compliance.
Thirdly, the traditional separation between data practitioners and governance experts is being bridged by AI agents that can translate policy documents into actionable workflows. While human oversight remains crucial, these agents scale expertise, allowing organizations to manage complex data landscapes more effectively. The challenge shifts from manual translation of policies to ensuring these agents correctly interpret and enforce them, demanding careful human involvement in the initial stages of adoption and confidence building.
Finally, the notion of a "data operating system" is emerging, where metadata platforms, enriched with semantics, facilitate end-to-end use cases. This means moving beyond simply finding and understanding data to enabling the creation of data models, dashboards, and other artifacts directly through natural language interfaces driven by AI. This elevates the role of data practitioners from lower-level tasks like cleaning and documenting data to higher-level strategic thinking focused on business outcomes, driven by the consolidation of tools and the increasing efficiency provided by AI agents. The biggest gap in current data management is not a lack of tools, but a loss of the bigger picture due to tool obsession, and the shift towards unified platforms and AI-driven automation is a necessary evolution to reclaim that focus.
Action Items
- Create unified metadata platform: Integrate discovery, observability, and governance workflows to support human and AI consumers.
- Implement AI agent documentation: Automate documentation generation by leveraging LLMs and the unified metadata graph (ref: OpenMetadata).
- Audit data access policies: For 5-10 critical data assets, review and document agent access controls and usage intent.
- Develop semantic data catalog: Define precise meanings for 3-5 key business concepts (e.g., customer lifetime value) using ontological underpinnings.
- Track AI agent usage: For 3-5 deployed AI agents, document their models, prompt versions, and data consumption patterns.
Key Quotes
"First full context of metadata is important for people to understand their data and, you know, do things with it. The second thing we realized is data as it got democratized self service, right, and nearly one third of people within an organization are in some way or shape or form they're data practitioners, they're using data for their day-to-day decisions, and we saw that these people were disconnected from each other and they were not collaborating with each other, which was the cause of many of the problems that we saw in the space of data. And then finally, the third thing that we saw is people, you know, who are exceptional with data were spending a lot of time on mundane, you know, tasks, right, of cleaning up the data, documenting the data, things like that. We saw that this needs to be automated, right, in order for people to make the best use of data and create outcomes with data, right. So that's that's our learning with which we started the OpenMetadata project."
Srinivas explains that the OpenMetadata project originated from observing three key challenges in data management: the need for comprehensive metadata context, the lack of collaboration among data practitioners, and the significant time spent on mundane tasks that could be automated. These insights formed the foundation for their approach to building a metadata platform.
"So, you know, data is transformative, right? It can transform the societies, you know, create new innovations. Harsha and I have been, you know, in data space for that reason. And, yeah, so, you know, you've seen, you know, what Hadoop brought to the data space, right? Before Hadoop, storing large amounts of data and processing large amounts of data was not possible, right? And through, you know, the solution that is based on commodity hardware, it made data accessible, right, for storing and processing large amounts of data, understand the world around us, right, through data. And so the potential of data is what, you know, I'm super excited about."
Srinivas articulates his long-standing passion for data, highlighting its transformative potential for societies and innovation. He uses the example of Hadoop to illustrate how advancements in data storage and processing have made vast amounts of data accessible, thereby enabling a deeper understanding of the world.
"The key phrase of the past ~2 years is 'context engineering.' What role does the metadata catalog play in that undertaking? What are the capabilities that the catalog needs to be able to effectively populate and curate that context? How much awareness does the LLM or agent need to have to be able to use the catalog effectively?"
This quote frames the current landscape of AI development, emphasizing the critical role of "context engineering." It poses fundamental questions about how metadata catalogs are essential for providing this context, what specific capabilities are required, and the necessary level of awareness for AI models and agents to effectively leverage this information.
"So, if you see LLMs are powered by data, right? Now, how do you power LLMs with data? Right? Context becomes very important. The meaning, right, that LLMs gather out of data becomes very important. So, OpenMetadata as a context for, you know, that provides context of data to LLMs is how we are empowering LLMs within the enterprise organizations to use AI, right, along with the data within the enterprises, right? It's a powerful enabler, enabler of LLM AI use cases, right, around the data within, you know, within the organizations."
Srinivas explains how OpenMetadata functions as a crucial enabler for Large Language Models (LLMs) within enterprises. He asserts that LLMs are fundamentally powered by data, and the meaning derived from that data, facilitated by context, is paramount. OpenMetadata provides this essential context, empowering organizations to leverage AI effectively with their internal data.
"So, for me, you know, there are two hats I wear. One is, you know, a technologist. The other one is a startup founder. The startup founder is, you know, really excited about the possibilities with technology. As a technologist, I'm always worried about the hype versus reality. In an OpenMetadata meetup, we were actually doing a demonstration of our MCP server that we had built, and then someone was demoing with Claude, right, the capabilities of OpenMetadata and how, you know, we expose tools that can be used by Claude. I was just amazed, right? Today, we have built all these... with Claude, you could actually combine the world of data or the internet, right, along with LLM capabilities with OpenMetadata where you can actually say, 'Give me all the banking terms,' and then it will give you banking terms, and then you can say, 'Hey, I want this, I don't want this term,' and then you curate your, you know, with natural language, curate your list of terms, and then you can say, 'Add it to OpenMetadata.'"
Srinivas shares a personal anecdote illustrating the practical impact of AI on user interfaces and workflows. He describes being amazed by a demonstration where Claude, an LLM, combined internet data with OpenMetadata's capabilities, allowing users to curate terms using natural language. This experience highlighted how AI can simplify complex tasks and shorten the path from a user's goal to its accomplishment.
"The biggest gap is, I believe, not having OpenMetadata in the infrastructure. I'll start with that. Yeah, I think not, I think as a data teams, we have more focused on or isolated problems. We touched upon earlier, right? So, you know, my as a, my world as a data engineer is about pipelines, you know, maybe Suresh has a data analyst problem, it's the dashboards, then there's business users and everything else. I don't think we are organizations are not there yet collectively thinking how to manage all of these things together and the outcome-based approach. I think where we are with OpenMetadata, I think that's what we are enabling to understand the landscape and enable the users to actually get the value out of it."
Srinivas identifies the primary gap in data management infrastructure as the absence of a comprehensive platform like OpenMetadata. He argues that data teams often focus on isolated problems, leading to a lack of collective thinking about managing the entire data landscape. He believes OpenMetadata's outcome-based approach is crucial for understanding this landscape and enabling users to derive true value from their data.
Resources
External Resources
Books
- "Data Engineering Principles" by Suresh Srinivas - Mentioned as a foundational concept for data management.
Articles & Papers
- "Context Engineering" (Phil Schmid) - Discussed as a key phrase and concept in the past few months.
- "Podcast Episode" (OpenMetadata) - Referenced as a previous discussion on OpenMetadata.
People
- Suresh Srinivas - Co-founder of OpenMetadata and Collate, previously worked on Hadoop at Yahoo and at Uber.
- Sriharsha Chintalapani - Co-founder and CTO of Collate, previously worked on data infrastructure at Yahoo and Hortonworks.
- Tobias Macey - Host of the Data Engineering Podcast.
Organizations & Institutions
- OpenMetadata - Open source metadata platform.
- Collate - Company building a managed offering around OpenMetadata.
- Hadoop - Technology for storing and processing large amounts of data.
- Yahoo - Previous employer of Suresh Srinivas and Sriharsha Chintalapani.
- Uber - Previous employer of Suresh Srinivas.
- Hortonworks - Company co-founded by Sriharsha Chintalapani.
- Prefect - Orchestration platform for data workflows.
- Datafold - Company offering an AI-powered Migration Agent.
- Bruin - Open source framework for data integration.
- MongoDB - Flexible, unified platform for developers.
- National Football League (NFL) - Mentioned in the context of data analysis.
- Pro Football Focus (PFF) - Data source for player grading.
- Cash App - Relies on Prefect for data operations.
- Cisco - Relies on Prefect for data operations.
- Whoop - Relies on Prefect for data operations.
- 1Password - Relies on Prefect for data operations.
- New England Patriots - Mentioned as an example team for performance analysis.
Tools & Software
- OpenMetadata MCP Server - Server providing semantic search and access control for OpenMetadata.
- JSON Schema - Standard used for expressing data in OpenMetadata.
- LangSmith - Observability platform.
- dbt - Tool for data transformation.
- API Gateway - Technology discussed in relation to data management.
Websites & Online Resources
- OpenMetadata (open-metadata.org) - Official website for the OpenMetadata project.
- MongoDB.com/Build - Website for MongoDB.
- dataengineeringpodcast.com/prefect - Link for Prefect.
- dataengineeringpodcast.com/datafold - Link for Datafold.
- dataengineeringpodcast.com/bruin - Link for Bruin.
Other Resources
- Model Context Protocol (MCP) - Protocol for model context.
- Schema-first, API-first - Approach to building platforms.
- Context Engineering - Concept related to providing context for AI.
- Semantics - Meaning derived from data, critical for AI.
- Ontologies - Frameworks for representing knowledge and meaning.
- RDF Ontologies - Ontologies used for semantic web and knowledge graphs.
- DCAT - Data Catalog Vocabulary.
- DPROD - Data Product.
- Schema.org - Vocabulary for structured data on the internet.
- AI Governance - Framework for governing AI systems.
- Data Quality - Aspect of data management ensuring accuracy and reliability.
- Data Observability - Aspect of data management monitoring data pipelines and systems.
- Data Lineage - Tracking the origin and transformations of data.
- Controlled Vocabulary - Set of predefined terms used for indexing and retrieval.
- Big Data - Handling and processing large datasets.
- Knowledge Graph - Network of interconnected entities and their relationships.
- ETL - Extract, Transform, Load process for data integration.
- LLMs (Large Language Models) - AI models capable of understanding and generating human-like text.
- Agentic AI - AI systems that can act autonomously to achieve goals.