Checkerboard Land Ownership Blocks Public Access, Corner Crossing Legalized
TL;DR
- The checkerboard land ownership pattern, established by railroad grants, creates millions of acres of "corner-locked" public land inaccessible without crossing private property, fundamentally limiting public access and use.
- Legalizing corner crossing, as established by the Tenth Circuit ruling, prevents private landowners from effectively monopolizing public land, ensuring broader access for recreation and resource use.
- The historical context reveals the checkerboard system was an unintended consequence of incentivizing railroad expansion, leading to vast private landholdings and ongoing conflicts over public access.
- Landowners' attempts to block corner crossing, including legal challenges and criminal charges, highlight a persistent tension between private property rights and the public's right to access government-owned land.
- The legal battles over corner crossing demonstrate how seemingly minor land-use disputes can escalate into significant court cases with nationwide implications for public land policy.
Deep Dive
The core of this narrative lies in a legal battle over public land access, sparked by four hunters' attempt to reach Elk Mountain in Wyoming. This conflict, rooted in the historical checkerboard land grants to railroads, reveals how a seemingly simple land division system has created vast tracts of inaccessible public land, leading to ongoing disputes and a significant legal fight that extends beyond hunting. The implications are profound, touching on property rights, government responsibility, and the very definition of public access in the American West.
The checkerboard land system, established in the mid-1800s as a means to incentivize railroad construction, divided federal land into alternating squares granted to railroads and retained by the government. This pattern, intended to facilitate westward expansion, has resulted in millions of acres of public land being "corner-locked," meaning they are only accessible by crossing private property. The story of hunters Brad Cape and Phil Yomans attempting to access Elk Mountain exemplifies this issue. Their efforts to "corner cross"--moving diagonally between adjacent public land squares at their corners--were met with resistance from the private landowner, Fred Eshelman, who viewed it as trespassing.
This resistance escalated into a legal war, with Eshelman suing the hunters for criminal trespass and seeking millions in damages, while the hunters defended their actions based on the principle of public access and the Unlawful Enclosures Act of 1885, which prohibits enclosing public lands. The case gained national attention, highlighting the systemic problem of corner-locked public lands and rallying support from hunting and environmental groups. The legal battles, culminating in a Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals decision that affirmed the legality of corner crossing in six western states, underscore a critical tension: the historical intent of public land grants versus the practical realities of private land ownership and the desire of landowners to control access. While the Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal, leaving the legality of corner crossing in other states uncertain, the case has significantly advanced the public's ability to access millions of acres of previously inaccessible land, challenging the notion that private ownership can indefinitely preclude public use of public resources.
Action Items
- Audit land access policies: Identify 3-5 areas with checkerboard land ownership patterns and assess current access restrictions.
- Draft legal framework proposal: Outline criteria for establishing public access rights across corner-locked public lands, referencing the unlawful enclosures act.
- Measure impact of land division: For 3-5 regions, quantify the acreage of corner-locked public land and its effect on recreational access.
- Analyze historical land grants: Review 2-3 railroad land grant agreements to understand the original intent and potential for access clauses.
- Develop public awareness campaign: Create 3-5 key messages explaining the checkerboard land ownership issue and its implications for public access.
Key Quotes
"The checkerboard as it's commonly known is a phenomenon unique to the American West, a pattern of land ownership which is found in huge areas from New Mexico all the way up to Washington. On a map, these particular areas look a lot like, well, a checkerboard or perhaps checkered linoleum tiles, but instead of alternating black and white squares, checkerboarded land alternates between single square mile parcels of public land and square mile parcels of private land."
This quote introduces the core concept of the "checkerboard" land ownership pattern prevalent in the American West. The author, Nick Mott, explains that this pattern, visually resembling a checkerboard, consists of alternating one-square-mile parcels of public and private land. This alternating ownership is the fundamental reason for the access issues discussed in the episode.
"There's a catch, though: when it comes to hunting or doing anything, really, on the checkerboarded area in the U.S., there's no legal way to pass through private property without the landowner's permission. That's trespassing. So, public land in the checkerboard is often very difficult to access. After all, any public square in a checkerboard is surrounded on all sides by private property; it's only ever caddy-corner to other public squares."
Nick Mott highlights the critical challenge presented by the checkerboard pattern: the inability to legally traverse private land to reach adjacent public parcels. This quote explains that because public squares are only diagonally adjacent to other public squares, access is effectively blocked by private ownership, leading to significant difficulties in reaching these public lands.
"So, this becomes a means of conquest, and once it's there, once in Indian lands can be sold to build the railroads, then the railroads can become the agency for conquering any remaining Indian resistance. So, this is how the whole system works, and in this way, it does become an agent of colonization."
This quote, attributed to historian Richard White, reveals the historical context and consequences of the checkerboard land grant system. White explains that the land grants to railroads were not just for economic development but also served as a tool for military conquest and colonization, facilitating the displacement of Native American populations.
"The hunters' designed, built, set up, and climbed a specialized ladder to cross through empty airspace in an empty field just so they could say that this time they were following the very letter of the law."
This passage describes the hunters' innovative solution to circumventing the legal barriers to accessing public land. The author details how the hunters constructed and used a ladder to cross over the property line without physically touching the private land or the "no trespassing" signs, demonstrating their commitment to adhering strictly to legal interpretations.
"The court laid out a history of the West, the railroads, the checkerboard grants, the enclosures, the range wars. It explained how the land is supposed to work. The opinion said these public lands in the West, they're for everyone, and that's who they were always for."
This quote summarizes the U.S. Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals' decision in the Iron Bar Holdings v. Cape case. The author notes that the court's opinion provided a historical overview and concluded that public lands in the West are intended for the use and enjoyment of everyone, establishing a precedent for public access.
Resources
External Resources
Books
- "Railroaded: The Transcontinentals and the Making of Modern America" by Richard White - Discussed as a source for understanding the federal government's aid to railroads in the mid-1800s and the resulting land grants.
People
- Richard White - Professor emeritus of history at Stanford, author of "Railroaded: The Transcontinentals and the Making of Modern America."
- Fred Eshelman - Pharmaceutical executive from North Carolina, owner of Elk Mountain Ranch, who sued the hunters.
- Ryan Samrad - Attorney representing the hunters in criminal and civil trials.
Organizations & Institutions
- Stanford - Mentioned as the institution where Richard White is a professor emeritus.
- Wyoming Fish and Game - Referenced for stating that corner crossing was legal.
- Carbon County Sheriff's Office - Contacted by the ranch manager regarding trespassers.
- U.S. Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals - Issued an opinion on the legality of corner crossing in six western states.
- U.S. Supreme Court - Refused to take up the appeal in the Iron Bar Holdings v. Cape case.
- Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks Agency - Stated that corner crossing remains unlawful in Montana.
Websites & Online Resources
- carvana.com - Mentioned for its car selling service.
- strawberrymecoaching.com - Mentioned for career coaching services.
- radiolab.org - Mentioned as a podcast from WNYC.
- 99pi.org - The website for the podcast "99% Invisible."
Podcasts & Audio
- 99% Invisible - The podcast where this episode originates, hosted by Roman Mars.
- Radiolab - Mentioned as a podcast from WNYC, influential to the existence of 99% Invisible.
Other Resources
- The Checkerboard - A phenomenon unique to the American West involving alternating square mile parcels of public and private land.
- Corner Crossing - A method of accessing public land by diagonally crossing at the corners where public squares touch, without touching private property.
- Unlawful Enclosures Act - A law passed in 1885 that guarantees public access to public land and prohibits enclosing land that is not owned.