January 6th Insurrectionists' Goals Unfulfilled Amidst Shifting Far-Right Ideology - Episode Hero Image

January 6th Insurrectionists' Goals Unfulfilled Amidst Shifting Far-Right Ideology

Original Title:

TL;DR

  • The January 6th insurrectionists' goals remain largely unfulfilled, as many involved have not seen their desired outcomes, and some groups have lost strength since the event.
  • Trump's pardons for January 6th rioters have led to dozens committing further crimes, while others seek restitution for perceived malicious prosecution, indicating a failure in justice and accountability.
  • Leaders of groups like the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers have faced reputational damage and diminished influence, partly due to accusations of being informants and internal divisions, hindering their organized activism.
  • The second Trump administration has disappointed many supporters, particularly regarding unreleased Epstein files and the lack of celebration for those who faced prison time for their actions.
  • The far-right's "America First" stance has shifted from isolationism to a more aggressive, warlike posture, embracing foreign intervention and resource acquisition as a form of national dominance.
  • The military's duty to refuse unlawful orders is a constitutional tenet, yet challenging such commands, as Senator Mark Kelly did, can lead to administrative reviews and accusations of sedition.
  • The Trump administration's overhaul of the CDC's childhood vaccine schedule, shifting to "shared clinical decision-making," introduces ambiguity and potentially reduces universal immunization against preventable diseases.

Deep Dive

President Trump's return to office following the January 6th events has not delivered the expected vindication for his supporters who stormed the Capitol. While Trump pardoned many rioters, dozens have re-offended, and the broader far-right movement has not regained the unified strength it held prior to January 6th, indicating a complex and ultimately disappointing outcome for many who risked imprisonment for his cause.

The landscape of far-right groups has significantly shifted since January 6th. Organizations like the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers, once prominently visible through direct confrontation and large-scale rallies, are now shadows of their former selves. Their leaders, such as Enrique Tarrio and Stewart Rhodes, have faced legal repercussions and reputational damage, including accusations of being informants or divisive figures within their own movements. This fragmentation and diminished public presence suggest that the groups' capacity for large-scale, coordinated action has been significantly curtailed, partly due to federal investigations and internal strife. Furthermore, the perception that January 6th was a federal provocation or entrapment has led to a general disinterest in large in-person gatherings outside of Trump rallies, pushing much of their activity into online spaces.

The second-term Trump administration's actions have also failed to meet the specific expectations of many January 6th participants and their backers. While pardons offered a degree of relief, they did not erase the legal consequences or the personal sacrifices made. Many individuals who believed they were acting as heroes for Trump now find themselves back in marginalized circumstances, their lives arguably worse due to prison time and ongoing lawsuits for reparations that have yielded no results. Beyond the January 6th participants, broader disappointment exists regarding unfulfilled promises, such as the release of the Epstein files. This suggests a disconnect between the fervent loyalty displayed by some supporters and the tangible outcomes delivered by the administration, leading to a sense of disillusionment.

Moreover, the far-right's ideological stance on foreign policy has shown a perplexing shift. Groups that previously championed an "America First" isolationist platform, railing against "forever wars" and foreign entanglements, have paradoxically embraced military action in Venezuela. This pivot appears to recast "America First" not as a call for inward focus and domestic strength, but as a justification for aggressive geopolitical dominance and resource acquisition, suggesting a malleable interpretation of core tenets driven by current events or specific political alignments rather than consistent ideology.

The future of the far-right movement appears increasingly fractured and competitive, particularly as Donald Trump's influence potentially wanes. The aftermath of events like the assassination of Charlie Kirk has created power vacuums, leading to internal "knife fighting" among prominent figures and media personalities. This jockeying for position and influence, as seen in public disputes at conferences, indicates a period of significant internal conflict and a struggle to define the movement's direction and leadership beyond Trump, signaling potential further fragmentation and infighting in the coming years.

Action Items

  • Audit January 6th pardons: For 50 pardoned individuals, track subsequent criminal activity and assess restitution outcomes to understand pardon policy effectiveness.
  • Analyze far-right group resilience: For Proud Boys and Oath Keepers, identify 3-5 key online platforms and measure engagement shifts post-January 6th to predict future activity.
  • Evaluate military refusal of orders protocol: For 3-5 lawmakers, document instances of discussing unlawful orders and assess the impact of public statements on service member awareness.
  • Track vaccine schedule policy impact: For 11 diseases, measure the change in vaccination rates post-overhaul and compare to 3-5 benchmark countries to assess public health outcomes.
  • Measure political rhetoric impact: For 3-5 far-right figures, analyze shifts in "America First" messaging related to foreign policy to understand ideological evolution.

Key Quotes

"And in his second term, Trump has disappointed many of the people who backed his insurrection -- including some of those willing to go to prison for him."

The author argues that despite the support shown by individuals willing to face imprisonment for Donald Trump, his second term has failed to meet their expectations. This suggests a disconnect between the actions of his supporters and the outcomes or policies of his administration. The speaker highlights a sense of disillusionment among those who were most committed to his cause.


"I mean, there had been protests in D.C. and in and in after Trump lost the election, but before January 6th, you know, Proud Boys would fight with Antifa or other leftist protesters and someone would get stabbed, stuff like that, and I sort of thought that that was going to be the amount of violence on January 6th."

Will Sommer explains that leading up to January 6th, he perceived the violence primarily as clashes between far-right and leftist groups, similar to previous incidents. Sommer indicates that he underestimated the potential for escalation, believing the existing level of conflict was the likely maximum. This quote reveals Sommer's initial assessment of the situation before the full scale of the January 6th events became apparent.


"And then I heard that that they were fighting, they were the protesters were breaking through the police lines on the West Side. I went over there. At the time, you know, I had already was somewhat well known and as a in terms of someone people on the right didn't like. I think if someone decided to target me, that the police had better things to do."

Will Sommer describes his experience on the ground during the January 6th events, moving towards the West Lawn as police lines were breached. Sommer notes his awareness of his public profile within certain circles, which he believed offered a degree of protection. This quote illustrates Sommer's personal observations and his assessment of his safety amidst the unfolding events.


"You know, this is a guy who there were questions about his spending. I think he spent a lot of money on steaks. Those sort of Oath Keepers who meant to, you know, be buying guns or building out the Oath Keepers. And so this is, you know, these figures, I think they, like Enrique Tarrio, they kind of depend on a big moment."

The speaker discusses Stewart Rhodes, a leader of the Oath Keepers, and raises concerns about his financial management, specifically mentioning spending on personal items like steaks. The speaker suggests that figures like Rhodes, similar to Enrique Tarrio, rely on significant events to maintain their influence. This quote points to internal issues and strategic dependencies within far-right groups.


"Well, I mean, since we're talking about January 6th, I mean, there have been all kinds of disappointments. I would say, and you mentioned the or I think probably the biggest one is releasing the Epstein files, but in the case of January 6th people in particular, I mean, I think they thought they were going to be heroes."

Will Sommer articulates the disappointment felt by those involved in the January 6th events, highlighting the unreleased Epstein files as a major grievance. Sommer suggests that individuals who participated in January 6th expected to be celebrated as heroes. This quote explains the unmet expectations and perceived lack of recognition for January 6th participants.


"But in this case, they have really, people like Alex Jones, Nick Fuentes, Gavin McInnes, the Proud Boys founder, they've really, for whatever reason, they love this war. And I think it's because they're kind of recasting America First as not sort of like, well, we look sort of look inward and and focus on building up our own country, don't get in these quagmire wars, but instead they're recasting it as sort of like America is a warlord country and we take whatever we want in that way being America First."

Will Sommer observes a shift in the rhetoric of certain far-right figures regarding foreign policy. Sommer notes that individuals like Alex Jones and Nick Fuentes, who previously advocated for an "America First" isolationist stance, now seem to support military intervention. Sommer explains this by suggesting they are redefining "America First" to mean a dominant, assertive global presence rather than inward focus.

Resources

External Resources

Books

  • "Make Iran Great Again" - Mentioned as a hat signed by Donald Trump.

Articles & Papers

  • "The Atlantic" - Referenced for a quote from President Trump regarding Venezuela.

People

  • Lindsey Graham - Mentioned for his comments on potential military action in Cuba.
  • Donald Trump - Referenced for his comments on Venezuela, his claims about the 2020 election, and his second term.
  • Pete Hegseth - Mentioned for his criticism of Mark Kelly's remarks on military obligations.
  • Mark Kelly - Mentioned for his remarks urging service members to remember their legal obligations to reject unlawful orders.
  • Charlie Kirk - Mentioned in relation to talk of the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers being reactivated.
  • Stewart Rhodes - Mentioned as a leader of the Oath Keepers who was pardoned by Trump.
  • Kelly Meggs - Mentioned as a leader of the Oath Keepers who was pardoned by Trump.
  • Marjorie Taylor Greene - Mentioned as a former Georgia Republican Representative disappointed with the second Trump administration.
  • Nicholas Maduro - Mentioned as the Venezuelan president arrested in a special forces raid.
  • Celia Flores - Mentioned as the wife of Nicholas Maduro who pleaded not guilty.
  • Delcy Rodriguez - Mentioned as Maduro's number two who was sworn in as interim president of Venezuela.
  • Chris Murphy - Mentioned for his comments on the military operation in Venezuela.
  • Tucker Carlson - Mentioned for his remarks at the Turning Point USA conference.
  • Ben Shapiro - Mentioned for his remarks at the Turning Point USA conference.
  • J.D. Vance - Mentioned as a subject of a proxy fight between Tucker Carlson and Ben Shapiro.
  • Nancy Drew - Mentioned as a fictional character entering the public domain.
  • Betty Boop - Mentioned as a fictional character entering the public domain.

Organizations & Institutions

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) - Mentioned in relation to its childhood vaccine schedule.
  • House Select Committee Investigating January 6th - Mentioned for releasing footage of the insurrection.
  • Proud Boys - Mentioned as an extremist group involved in January 6th and their current activity.
  • Oath Keepers - Mentioned as a far-right militia group whose leaders were pardoned by Trump.
  • The Bulwark - Mentioned as the publication where Will Sommer is a senior reporter.
  • Vice Magazine - Mentioned as co-founded by Gavin McInnes.
  • Turning Point USA - Mentioned for its conference where Tucker Carlson and Ben Shapiro were present.
  • Zbiotics - Mentioned as a probiotic drink.
  • Starbucks - Mentioned for its protein lattes.
  • Walgreens - Mentioned for its joint support products and Medicare Advantage OTC benefits.
  • Associated Press - Mentioned as a source of help for the show.
  • Writers Guild of America East - Mentioned as the union for the production staff.

Websites & Online Resources

  • Pod Save America - Mentioned as a podcast where Senator Kelly spoke.
  • Crooked.com - Mentioned as the website for the "What a Day" newsletter.

Podcasts & Audio

  • Pod Save the World - Mentioned for episodes unpacking the events in Venezuela and other global news.
  • Keep It - Mentioned as a podcast covering awards season.

Other Resources

  • January 6th - Mentioned as the date of the insurrection and its aftermath.
  • Make America Great Again - Mentioned in relation to a hat signed by Donald Trump.
  • America First - Mentioned as a political stance that has been recasted by some on the far right.
  • Epstein Files - Mentioned as a disappointment for those who expected them to be released.
  • Rsv (Respiratory Syncytial Virus) - Mentioned as a vaccine now recommended only for high-risk groups.
  • Rotavirus - Mentioned as a vaccine that now requires "shared clinical decision making."
  • Covid-19 - Mentioned as a vaccine that now requires "shared clinical decision making."
  • Meningitis - Mentioned as a vaccine that now requires "shared clinical decision making."
  • Hepatitis A - Mentioned as a vaccine that now requires "shared clinical decision making."
  • Hepatitis B - Mentioned as a vaccine that now requires "shared clinical decision making."
  • Flu - Mentioned as a vaccine that now requires "shared clinical decision making."

---
Handpicked links, AI-assisted summaries. Human judgment, machine efficiency.
This content is a personally curated review and synopsis derived from the original podcast episode.