True Stoicism: Common Good Over Self-Interest and Resentment
TL;DR
- True Stoicism emphasizes contributing to the common good and actively engaging in public life, rather than retreating into self-interest or indifference, as demonstrated by Seneca's involvement in politics.
- Misinterpreting Stoicism as emotional repression or a tool for personal gain, as seen in figures like Andrew Tate, perverts its core principles and leads to harmful resentment.
- Prioritizing philosophy, family, or self-improvement over obligations, akin to Alexander the Great's approach to conquered territories, ensures these vital aspects receive due attention and resources.
- The Stoic concept of expanding circles of concern, from self to all living things, guides individuals to actively care for others and improve the world, even at personal cost.
- Young men are drawn to Stoicism for guidance on meaningful living, but grifters exploit this need by twisting its tenets into notions of resentment and isolation.
- Marcus Aurelius repeatedly stressed the importance of character and acting for the common good, demonstrating that power does not necessitate a loss of compassion or empathy.
Deep Dive
The core argument is that young men are drawn to Stoicism for its promise of self-mastery and personal strength, but often misunderstand it as a justification for emotional repression or self-serving ambition. This misinterpretation, amplified by grifters, misses Stoicism's fundamental emphasis on character, the common good, and active engagement with the world. The true Stoic path requires extending concern beyond oneself to encompass all humanity, a principle often overlooked in the pursuit of individualistic gains.
The initial appeal of Stoicism for young men stems from its offering of guidance in a world that often leaves them feeling adrift. They seek tools to master emotions, overcome challenges, and achieve greatness, seeing figures like Marcus Aurelius as exemplars of resilience and power. This entry point, however, frequently leads to a superficial understanding where Stoicism is reduced to a method for suppressing feelings or for gaining an advantage in worldly pursuits. This is a distortion that grifters exploit by perverting Stoic concepts, mixing them with notions of toxic masculinity and directing adherents toward resentment and a rejection of broader societal progress. The critical error lies in mistaking the Stoic goal of managing destructive emotions for a mandate of emotional emptiness, or believing that self-mastery permits disregard for others.
Second-order implications of this misunderstanding are significant. When Stoicism is framed as a means to avoid human empathy or to justify self-centered actions without consequence, it actively undermines its own philosophical aims. Marcus Aurelius, despite wielding immense power, consistently emphasized the importance of good character and acting for the common good, a concept he mentioned frequently. His philosophy was not about retreating from the world, as some other ancient schools did, but about actively engaging with public life and striving to improve society. The Stoic ideal is to expand one's circle of concern from the self and immediate family to encompass all humanity, treating individuals as cosmopolitan citizens of the world rather than solely members of narrow groups. This outward focus, this "pulling the outer rings inward," is the essential Stoic practice, aiming to benefit others even at personal cost.
The corrosive effect of the misinterpretation is that it fosters a hardness of heart, a shield against genuine human connection and civic responsibility, rather than the robust character and engaged citizenship that Stoicism truly champions. The philosophy, when studied deeply, naturally leads individuals toward concern for justice and the common good, as evidenced by the extensive discussions of these themes in Stoic texts. Therefore, the ultimate takeaway is that a superficial engagement with Stoicism can lead to a self-isolating and potentially harmful ideology, while a deeper understanding reveals a philosophy that compels active participation in the world for the betterment of all.
Action Items
- Create personal priority matrix: Assign 3-5 key life areas (e.g., family, health, work) to quadrants based on importance and urgency.
- Audit personal time allocation: Track 5-10 daily activities for one week to identify time spent on non-essential tasks versus core priorities.
- Draft a "common good" statement: Define personal commitment to contributing positively to at least one community or social cause.
- Implement a "leftovers" rule: Dedicate the first 30-60 minutes of the workday to a high-priority personal development or philosophical study activity.
Key Quotes
"You went to school, you worked hard, you sacrificed, you got really good at what you do. That's what they pay you for, right? That's why they recruited you, that's why they put you in charge. You earned it. And yet, despite this success, this track record, this leverage you have, your life is so backwards."
The author argues that external achievements like education and hard work do not automatically equate to a well-ordered life. This quote highlights a common paradox where success in one area can coexist with personal disarray, suggesting that true success involves more than just professional accomplishment.
"Alexander, Seneca tells us, quietly corrected them, saying that he hadn't come to Asia with the intention of accepting whatever they cared to give him, but of letting them keep whatever he chose to leave them."
The author uses this anecdote about Alexander the Great to illustrate a principle of agency and control. This quote demonstrates that true power lies not in receiving what is offered, but in dictating what remains, a concept the author later applies to how one should approach their own time and priorities.
"Philosophy likewise tells all other occupations," he wrote, "it is not my intention to accept whatever time is left over for you. You shall have instead," he says, "what I regret." Philosophy should not get the leftovers, or as we said in a Daily Dad email and podcast about this same idea, neither should your family."
The author, referencing Seneca, argues that essential pursuits like philosophy or family should not be relegated to spare moments. This quote emphasizes that these core aspects of life deserve dedicated attention and the best of one's time and energy, rather than being treated as secondary obligations.
"There's no one who will give them the guidance that they desperately need and crave. There's no one that says, 'Hey, here's how you live a good and meaningful life, but also a challenging life. Here's how you do what you were put here to do.'"
The author explains the appeal of Stoicism to young men by pointing out a societal gap in providing essential life guidance. This quote articulates the need for a philosophy that offers direction on living a meaningful, challenging, and purposeful life, which the author suggests Stoicism can provide.
"I don't think it should surprise us then, though, that grifters and demagogues would step in to fill this space. What you see people doing, whether it's Andrew Tate or whoever, is they pervert the ideas in Stoicism. They take some of these core ideas and they mix it with notions of masculinity and other cultural traditions."
The author critiques how certain figures distort Stoic principles for their own gain, particularly when appealing to young men. This quote identifies the perversion of Stoicism by mixing its core ideas with problematic notions of masculinity and tradition, leading to harmful interpretations.
"The Stoics weren't emotionless. There is a part of Stoicism that's about being less emotional, particularly destructive emotions. So the Stoics were not repressed, emotionless robots. And if you think that's what Stoicism is going to help you do, you're doing it wrong."
The author clarifies a common misconception about Stoicism, distinguishing it from a state of emotional repression. This quote asserts that Stoicism aims to manage destructive emotions rather than eliminate all feelings, correcting the stereotype of Stoics as unfeeling automatons.
"The point of life is good character and acts for the common good."
The author presents a core tenet of Stoicism, attributed to Marcus Aurelius, to counter misinterpretations. This quote emphasizes that the ultimate purpose of life, according to Stoicism, is the cultivation of virtue and contributing positively to society, not self-serving actions.
"The purpose of Stoic philosophy, the rational purpose, was to pull these outer rings inward, to really care about other people and to try to make the world better for them, sometimes especially even at the cost of one's own interest."
The author explains the Stoic concept of "cosmopolitanism" and its ethical implications. This quote describes the Stoic aim of expanding one's concern beyond personal circles to encompass all of humanity, prioritizing the collective good even at personal expense.
Resources
External Resources
Books
- "Meditations" by Marcus Aurelius - Mentioned as a foundational text for understanding Stoicism, particularly its emphasis on character, common good, and justice.
Articles & Papers
- "Who Decides Who Gets What?" (Daily Stoic Podcast) - Discussed in relation to the concept of earned success versus accepting what is offered.
People
- Seneca - Referenced for his letters and stories illustrating Stoic principles, particularly regarding priorities and the pursuit of philosophy.
- Alexander the Great - Mentioned in a story by Seneca to illustrate the principle of taking what one chooses rather than accepting what is offered.
- Andrew Tate - Cited as an example of someone who perverts Stoic ideas by mixing them with notions of masculinity and exploiting others.
Organizations & Institutions
- Daily Stoic - Mentioned as the source of the podcast and daily emails, promoting Stoic philosophy.
- University of Texas - Referenced as the origin of research for the sponsor Human.
Websites & Online Resources
- daily stoic com - Mentioned as the website for more information on the Daily Stoic podcast and its philosophy.
- human com stoic - Referenced as the website for the sponsor Human, offering cardiovascular health supplements.
- monarch com - Referenced as the website for the sponsor Monarch, a personal finance tool.
Other Resources
- Stoicism - The core philosophical concept discussed throughout the text, with distinctions made between uppercase (true) and lowercase (stereotypical) Stoicism.
- Cardiovascular system - Mentioned as a foundational biological system and an area of investment for elite athletes and longevity experts.
- Nitric oxide production - Discussed in relation to the benefits of supplements for healthy blood flow.
- Personal finance tool - Described as the function of the sponsor Monarch, integrating budgeting, investments, and planning.
- AI tools built on Monarch Intelligence - Mentioned as a feature of Monarch for accessing financial advice and insights.
- Circles of concern - A Stoic concept describing concentric rings of care, expanding from self to all living things.