Paramount's Hostile Bid Challenges Netflix for Warner Bros.
TL;DR
- Paramount's hostile bid for Warner Bros. leverages regulatory approval perceptions and an all-cash offer, aiming to sway shareholders by highlighting potential advantages over Netflix's stock-and-cash deal.
- The valuation of Warner Bros.' spun-off television unit (CNN, TNT, TBS) is the core disagreement, directly impacting the total value of each acquisition offer for shareholders.
- Netflix's acquisition of Warner Bros. assets is perceived as a more certain future due to Netflix's established streaming dominance, contrasting with uncertainty around Ellison's leadership at Paramount.
- Paramount's proposed $6 billion in synergies implies significant layoffs, whereas Netflix's projected $2-3 billion suggests a less disruptive integration, potentially preserving more jobs.
- David Ellison's bid for Warner Bros. is more believable to industry insiders due to his stated commitment to theatrical releases, unlike Netflix's historical focus on streaming exclusivity.
- Donald Trump's political influence is a significant x-factor, with both bidders needing to navigate his shifting allegiances and potential demands for personal or political gain.
- The ensemble casting strategy for Rian Johnson's films prioritizes chemistry, with a "green room" concept fostering actor interaction, suggesting a self-selecting process for talent seeking collaborative experiences.
Deep Dive
The sale of Warner Bros. is unfolding into a complex, multi-bidder scenario, with Netflix emerging as the initial winner but facing a hostile takeover attempt from Paramount. This situation presents significant implications for the future of content ownership, regulatory oversight, and the strategic direction of major media entities, forcing shareholders to weigh competing valuations and potential outcomes.
Paramount's aggressive "hostile" bid directly to shareholders, valuing Warner Bros. at over $100 billion including debt, challenges Netflix's earlier agreement. Paramount argues its offer is superior, projecting smoother regulatory approval due to its horizontal merger structure compared to Netflix's acquisition of streaming and studio assets. This contention, however, hinges on the valuation of the spun-off television division, creating a fundamental disagreement between the bidders. Netflix's offer, valued at approximately $27.75 per share and comprising cash and stock, leaves a residual "stub" of CNN, TNT, and TBS, whose uncertain worth impacts the overall deal value. Paramount, conversely, offers an all-cash bid for the entire company, simplifying valuation but introducing its own regulatory considerations.
The regulatory landscape, particularly concerning any potential involvement of Donald Trump, remains a significant variable. Both Netflix and Paramount have engaged in efforts to ingratiate themselves with the former president, recognizing his potential influence. Paramount's bid, for instance, includes Jared Kushner, whose father-in-law is Trump. This dynamic introduces an element of political negotiation, where the ultimate decision could be influenced by perceived alliances and past interactions, rather than purely market-based considerations. Furthermore, the projected synergies--layoffs resulting from consolidation--differ significantly: Paramount forecasts $6 billion, while Netflix estimates $2-3 billion. Netflix's lower synergy projection suggests a greater likelihood of preserving existing operations and jobs, particularly within the Warner Bros. studio, aligning with its strategy of expanding content acquisition rather than aggressive cost-cutting.
Ultimately, the decision for Warner Bros. shareholders will likely hinge on maximizing financial return and ensuring the certainty of payment. Beyond immediate valuation, however, lies a strategic divergence: Netflix represents a dominant force in the streaming era, offering a path to integrate Warner's assets into a proven global platform. Paramount, led by David Ellison, presents itself as a more traditional steward of film and television assets, with a stated commitment to theatrical releases and content licensing, which may appeal to those concerned about the long-term health of the traditional studio model. The ongoing bidding war and the differing strategic visions of Netflix and Paramount will shape the future of these iconic media assets and set precedents for industry consolidation.
Action Items
- Audit Warner Bros. sale process: Identify 3-5 key decision points and potential regulatory hurdles for future M&A scenarios.
- Draft contingency plan: Outline 3-5 alternative deal structures for asset sales, considering regulatory and shareholder approval risks.
- Analyze shareholder value drivers: Calculate the potential impact of residual asset value on overall deal valuation for 2-3 acquisition scenarios.
- Evaluate synergy claims: Quantify potential layoff impact for 2-3 proposed merger scenarios, comparing stated synergy figures.
Key Quotes
"Paramount started complaining about the Netflix offer even before it had been approved because they were getting the sense that they were going to lose. They sent the what I call the jilted lover letter where they were very upset that it was slipping away and started crying foul."
Lucas Shaw explains that Paramount's immediate criticism of the Netflix deal, even before official approval, indicated their awareness of losing the bid. Shaw characterizes this reaction as a "jilted lover letter," highlighting Paramount's distress and their attempt to undermine the competing offer.
"The valuation of the cable networks is how you understand the fundamental sort of disagreement between Paramount and Warner Brothers Discovery over whose deal is better and it's I'd say it's one of sort of three ways to well maybe maybe four but one of three ways to to judge the offers."
Lucas Shaw identifies the valuation of cable networks as a central point of contention between Paramount and Warner Brothers Discovery regarding the superiority of their respective deals. Shaw suggests this is one of the primary metrics for evaluating the offers, alongside other factors.
"The deciding factor is who's going to pay me the most money and am I actually going to get paid. Those are the two things that I think all of them are right."
Matt Bellany suggests that for a Warner's shareholder, the ultimate deciding factors in the sale of the company are the amount of money offered and the certainty of receiving payment. Bellany posits that these two considerations are paramount for any shareholder evaluating the competing bids.
"I think that Netflix comes from a place of strength now. They have the deal, they have a signed document from the Warner's board saying that they wanted to do this deal. It's now Ellison's job to upend that and revisit it and other than offering you know a ton more money there's not that much you can do to kind of change the mind of the board."
Matt Bellany argues that Netflix holds a strong position in the acquisition process due to their existing agreement with the Warner Brothers board. Bellany explains that the Ellison family, representing Paramount, faces a significant challenge in altering the board's decision without substantially increasing their offer.
"The simple fact is that Warner's does a lot of things that Netflix doesn't do and because of that if Netflix takes on those businesses all of a sudden perhaps the Warner Brothers studio would continue to release theatrical movies and license content to other buyers and do a lot of the things that Netflix doesn't currently do and thus those people save their jobs and it's better for the overall industry."
Matt Bellany posits that if Netflix acquires Warner Brothers, the continuation of Warner's existing business practices, such as releasing theatrical films and licensing content, could preserve jobs and benefit the broader industry. Bellany contrasts this with Netflix's current operational model, which differs significantly from Warner's.
"I have always made the kinds of movies I love, which are populist, big-hearted, crowd-pleasing movies. So when Deadpool and Wolverine hit the way it did and when the audiences reacted the way they did, it felt so good that I would never betray that feeling and I would never betray that audience."
Shawn Levy expresses his commitment to making populist, crowd-pleasing films, drawing a distinction from more arthouse fare. Levy states that the overwhelmingly positive reception of "Deadpool & Wolverine" reinforces his dedication to his audience and that he would not compromise that feeling by rushing into a sequel without a compelling story.
Resources
External Resources
Books
- "Wake Up Dead Man" by Rian Johnson - Mentioned as a project writer-director Rian Johnson and producer Ram Bergman are discussing.
Articles & Papers
- "Netflix’s bombshell move to acquire Warner Bros. still reverberating through the town" (The Hollywood Reporter) - Referenced as a report on Netflix's acquisition of Warner Bros.
- "Paramount has gone fully hostile--bypassing Warner leadership and taking its case straight to shareholders" (The Hollywood Reporter) - Referenced as a report on Paramount's hostile bid for Warner Bros.
People
- Matt Belloni - Co-host of "The Business" podcast, discussing media and entertainment industry news.
- Lucas Shaw - Head of the Media and Entertainment Group at Bloomberg, providing analysis on the Warner Bros. sale.
- Kim Masters - Original host of "The Business" podcast, currently sidelined due to illness.
- Rian Johnson - Writer-director of "Wake Up Dead Man," discussing his creative process and past projects.
- Ram Bergman - Producer of "Wake Up Dead Man," discussing his creative process and past projects.
- Shawn Levy - Executive producer of "Stranger Things," discussing his future with Marvel and past projects.
- David Zaslav - CEO of Warner Discovery, mentioned in relation to the Warner Bros. sale negotiations.
- Larry Ellison - Mentioned as a long-time friend of Donald Trump and involved in the Paramount bid.
- Jared Kushner - Mentioned as a member of the bidding team on the Ellison side.
- Donald Trump - Former U.S. President, discussed as an "x factor" in the regulatory approval of media deals.
- Ted Sarandos - Co-CEO of Netflix, discussed in relation to Netflix's acquisition strategy and synergy estimates.
- Marjorie Taylor Greene - Mentioned in the context of 60 Minutes interviews and Donald Trump's reactions.
- Jeremy Renner - Mentioned in relation to Glenn Close getting sick during shooting.
- Glenn Close - Actress who became sick with COVID-19 during the shooting of a project.
- Bryce Dessner - Composer of the original score for "Train Dreams."
- Joel Edgerton - Lead actor in "Train Dreams."
- Roger Ebert - Film critic, quoted on the film "Train Dreams."
- Josh O'Connor - Actor cast in "Wake Up Dead Man."
- Mary Vernieu - Casting director for Rian Johnson's films.
- Brett Howell - Casting director for Rian Johnson's films.
- Tom Rothman - Mentioned for his role in greenlighting "Night at the Museum" and his current position at Sony.
- Alan Menken - Mentioned as developing a Broadway musical for "Night at the Museum."
- Michael Start - Producer of "The Business" podcast.
- Mario Saavedra - Mixer for "The Business" podcast.
Organizations & Institutions
- Warner Bros. - Subject of acquisition discussions and negotiations.
- Netflix - Bidder for Warner Bros., a streaming powerhouse.
- Paramount - Bidder for Warner Bros., making a hostile offer.
- The Ellison Family - Owners of Paramount, involved in the bid for Warner Bros.
- HBO - Mentioned as a valuable asset of Warner Bros.
- CNN - Mentioned as part of the television unit to be spun out from Warner Bros. Discovery.
- TNT - Mentioned as part of the television unit to be spun out from Warner Bros. Discovery.
- TBS - Mentioned as part of the television unit to be spun out from Warner Bros. Discovery.
- KCRW - Sponsor of "The Business" podcast.
- Marvel - Studio involved with "Deadpool & Wolverine" and potential future collaborations.
- 20th Century Studios - Mentioned in relation to "Night at the Museum" development.
- Disney - Mentioned in relation to "Night at the Museum" development.
- Sony - Current employer of Tom Rothman.
- PFF (Pro Football Focus) - Mentioned as a data source in a previous context.
- SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) - Mentioned in relation to a filing by Paramount.
Websites & Online Resources
- Puck - Publication where Matt Belloni works.
- Bloomberg - Organization where Lucas Shaw works.
- KCRW.com - Website for KCRW, used for streaming shows and donations.
- IMDb - Mentioned in relation to Sean Levy's project development.
Other Resources
- "Everything you need to know about the Warner Bros. sale (so far)" - Title of the podcast episode.
- "Deadpool & Wolverine" - Film discussed by Sean Levy regarding future sequels.
- "Stranger Things" - Television series executive produced by Shawn Levy.
- "Wake Up Dead Man" - Film by Rian Johnson and Ram Bergman.
- "Knives Out" - Film by Rian Johnson and Ram Bergman, discussed in relation to cast chemistry.
- "Glass Onion" - Film by Rian Johnson and Ram Bergman, discussed in relation to cast chemistry and shooting conditions.
- "Night at the Museum" - Film franchise discussed by Sean Levy regarding potential relaunch.
- "Train Dreams" - Film nominated for Golden Globes and Critics' Choice Awards.
- "K Pop Demon Hunters" - Film nominated for Grammy Awards, Golden Globe, and Critics' Choice Award.
- "Spectacular Now" - Film produced by Sean Levy's company.
- "Arrival" - Film produced by Sean Levy's company, discussed as a model for future projects.
- "Pink Panther" - Film directed by Sean Levy.
- "The Dictator" - Film directed by Sean Levy.
- "Just Married" - Film directed by Sean Levy.
- "Big Fat Liar" - Film directed by Sean Levy.
- "The Business" - Podcast name.
- "60 Minutes" - Television news program mentioned in relation to Donald Trump's reactions.
- "The Daily Beast" - Publication that praised "Train Dreams."
- "RogerEbert.com" - Website that reviewed "Train Dreams."
- "KCRW app" - Mobile application for KCRW.