Toxic Adult Culture Undermines Youth Arts Programs Through Gatekeeping - Episode Hero Image

Toxic Adult Culture Undermines Youth Arts Programs Through Gatekeeping

Original Title:

TL;DR

  • Gatekeeping knowledge disguised as tradition prevents program growth by hoarding information, thereby stifling volunteerism and connection among new parents.
  • Using credentials as a weapon, such as "my band is BOA," creates superiority disguised as advice, leading to toxic environments and discouraging newcomers.
  • Adult insecurity and fear manifest as "Dance Mom energy" in youth arts programs, creating scarcity and hierarchy that negatively impacts children's sense of safety.
  • Toxic adult culture in youth arts programs leads to student insecurity and division, causing preventable program collapses that are unrelated to student talent.
  • When adults model emotional immaturity and conflict avoidance, actual teenagers are forced into a parenting role, normalizing negative behaviors.
  • Strong programs prioritize passing down information and fostering community over protecting knowledge, enabling newcomers to feel safe and learn effectively.
  • Leadership in arts programs requires imparting knowledge and building up participants with small wins, rather than solely demonstrating personal expertise.

Deep Dive

A toxic culture, mirroring high school "mean girls" dynamics, is insidiously invading adult volunteer groups supporting youth arts programs, particularly in band and booster clubs. This "Dance Mom energy" manifests as gatekeeping, credential flexing, and exclusion, creating an environment where new parents are shamed into silence, directly harming student well-being and program sustainability.

The core issue is adults weaponizing their experience and perceived status within these programs. Instead of fostering a supportive community, knowledge is hoarded as a means of protecting social standing, and credentials are used to establish superiority rather than offer genuine mentorship. This creates an "us versus them" mentality and a scarcity mindset, where approval is used as a tool for control. The immediate consequence is that new parents, seeking connection and support, are intimidated into silence, which erodes volunteerism and the vital support systems these programs rely on. This toxic environment directly impacts students, who absorb the tension and division, leading to feelings of unsafety and contributing to program collapse. These collapses are often preventable, stemming not from a lack of talent but from adults forgetting the fundamental purpose of these programs -- to nurture and develop young people.

The most significant second-order implication is that adults acting like emotional teenagers force actual teenagers to parent the room, modeling poor conflict resolution, empathy, and leadership. This is not about disagreements or conflict, which are natural, but about the tone, posture, and ego that accompany them. A digital eye-roll or a dismissive "that's just how band is" response to a beginner's question is not guidance; it is humiliation and avoidance. Healthy programs, therefore, do not grow by hoarding information or creating hierarchies, but by actively mentoring newcomers and making them feel safe to learn. The ultimate takeaway is that program success hinges on leaders cultivating community and imparting knowledge, rather than flexing their own experience. By modeling positive behavior, adults can create an environment where young people learn valuable life skills, rather than internalizing the insecurities and rivalries of the adults around them.

Action Items

  • Audit program culture: Identify 3-5 instances of gatekeeping or credential-flexing in communication channels (ref: "Dance Mom energy" concept).
  • Create mentorship framework: Define 5 key areas for knowledge sharing (e.g., setup, common failures, rollback) to prevent silos.
  • Implement "new parent welcome" process: Assign 2-3 experienced members to guide newcomers and answer initial questions.
  • Measure volunteer impact: Track 5-10 new volunteer onboarding successes to assess program inclusivity and support.
  • Draft program values statement: Outline 3-4 core principles emphasizing inclusivity, respect, and shared learning for all members.

Key Quotes

"i thought this was a group to come learn from and ask for advice and get support from the band community the last several posts i've read have been innocent questions asking for advice and the op has been essentially attacked for asking the questions can we please remember that number one we are all people just trying to figure stuff out can we please treat each other with respect and kindness number two read the post all the way before commenting and attacking the op for something unrelated to their question and number three we don't all come from big bands or boa bands so we all have different experiences if your experience doesn't apply to the question then keep scrolling you don't have to comment on every post"

This quote, from a post within a national band parent group, highlights a breakdown in community support. The author argues that innocent questions are being met with attacks, suggesting a need for more respect, kindness, and careful reading before responding. Mike DeJohn uses this to illustrate how a space meant for learning and support is becoming toxic.


"when parents are scared to attach their names to a plea for kindness i think that tells you the culture already has edge sharp enough to cut someone and that's a problem"

Mike DeJohn points out that the anonymity of the original post seeking kindness is a significant indicator of a negative culture. He argues that when individuals feel unsafe expressing basic needs for respect, the environment has become hostile. This observation underscores the severity of the issue beyond a single incident.


"there aren't just mean girls and victims there's retaliation there's insecurity there's burnout there's hierarchy there's fear there's veteran status that's turned into social currency and all of it blends together into something that feels a lot like high school but with much higher stakes"

Mike DeJohn explains that the "Dance Mom" energy observed in adult spaces is not simply about individual maliciousness. He argues that it is a complex blend of adult insecurities, burnout, and the misuse of experience as social currency. This creates a dynamic that mirrors high school social hierarchies but with more significant consequences.


"the kids do not cause these problems we do the adults do kids don't create cliques and booster groups they don't shame other parents for not knowing terminology they don't jump on strangers online for asking beginner questions kids don't create us versus them and kids don't weaponize experience those are things that adults do"

Mike DeJohn asserts that adults are the primary source of toxic culture in youth arts programs, not the children involved. He argues that behaviors like creating cliques, shaming, and exclusion are modeled by adults and then imitated by children. This emphasizes the responsibility adults hold in shaping program dynamics.


"strong programs don't protect information they pass it down"

Mike DeJohn presents this as a core principle for healthy programs. He argues that successful programs thrive by sharing knowledge and experience, rather than hoarding it for social status. This contrasts with gatekeeping behavior, which he identifies as detrimental to growth and community.


"you don't grow programs by flexing what you know you grow them by making other people feel safe to learn"

Mike DeJohn concludes by emphasizing that true program growth comes from fostering an inclusive and safe learning environment. He argues against using one's own knowledge or experience as a means of asserting superiority. Instead, he advocates for welcoming newcomers and creating opportunities for them to learn and contribute.

Resources

External Resources

Podcasts & Audio

  • SoundstageEDU: Building Better Theater Tech - Mentioned as the podcast hosting this episode.

Other Resources

  • Dance Mom energy - Referenced as a metaphor for toxic adult behavior in youth arts programs.
  • Burn book scene (from a musical) - Used as an example of collective guilt and shared experience.
  • Chops - Mentioned in the context of musical performance skill not equating to teaching ability.

---
Handpicked links, AI-assisted summaries. Human judgment, machine efficiency.
This content is a personally curated review and synopsis derived from the original podcast episode.